There’s a lot of noise about “AI-first product.” In practice, that phrase gets used two different ways.
One way is shipping AI into the product — copilots, generative widgets, model-powered features customers click. We’ve run a few of those as tests. Useful learning as we plan to deliver new value to our customers in the future.
The other way — the one I care about as VP of Product at B2Gnow — is using AI to multiply the Product and Technology team itself. We’re a PE-backed SaaS platform helping agencies and enterprises stay compliant on public-infrastructure and government-related work: supplier diversity, labor compliance, vendor management, audits and payments, grant workflows. The work is complex. The team is lean. The expectation is still to mature the org, govern the roadmap, and ship.
So we treat AI as leverage on how we work.
What “AI-first” means for us day to day
Internally, AI shows up in the jobs that used to bottleneck a small product org:
- Market and opportunity planning — structuring research, comparing segments, pressure-testing prioritization before we spend scarce engineering capacity
- Feature and design development — exploring options faster, drafting flows and acceptance criteria, tightening problem statements
- Delivery hygiene — turning decisions into Jira epics and tickets that engineers can actually execute
- Internal Q&A — getting shared context out of people’s heads and into answers the team can reuse
- Product marketing and enablement — first drafts of narrative, FAQs, and launch support that humans then make true
We don’t bet on one vendor religion. The stack is pragmatic: Cursor, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok Bot, and whatever else earns its keep. Tools change. The operating idea doesn’t: every hour of PM/UX/PMM capacity should buy more clarity and more finished work.
Why this matters more than feature theater in compliance
Compliance customers buy trust, auditability, and workflows that survive contact with real programs. A flashy AI surface that can’t be grounded, permissioned, and supported becomes a liability. Meanwhile, a Product team that can discover, specify, and GTM twice as effectively compounds quietly — better prioritization, cleaner tickets, fewer “we’ll figure it out in build” surprises, faster honest messaging.
That’s the force-multiplier thesis. Not “we sprinkled AI on the roadmap.” “We run Product like an AI-assisted operating system.”
Guardrails we actually use
- Humans own the decisions. AI drafts; people decide roadmap bets, positioning, and what we promise customers.
- No invented obligations. Especially in compliance-adjacent work, confident nonsense is expensive.
- Work product over chat logs. The win is a better epic, a sharper brief, a clearer launch doc — not a clever prompt thread.
- Teach the team the habit. Force multiplication fails if only one person has the tools open.
What I’d tell another PE-backed product leader
If your board asks whether you’re “AI-first,” answer with operating metrics, not feature counts: cycle time from insight to ticket, quality of discovery docs, throughput of a small cross-functional team, consistency of GTM narrative. Ship customer-facing AI when it earns a job-to-be-done. Build the internal muscle either way.
That’s how we’re approaching it at B2Gnow — a small Product organization punching above its weight, on purpose.
Want the career context behind this? See my Work History or get in touch via Contact.
More on how I lead: Product Leader, Work History, or get in touch.